Drawing for S&H SUPERIOR HAIR

USPTO serial 79102530

S&H SUPERIOR HAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S&H SUPERIOR HAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Adhesives for affixing false hair; hair lotions; shampoosSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
008Beard clippers, non-electric hand implements for hair curling, hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric, razor cases of all kinds, curling tongs, razor blades, shaving cases, razor strops, razors, electric or non-electricSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Electrothermal apparatus for waving and smoothing hairSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
010Hair prosthesesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Hair dryers, curling lampsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
022HairSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
026Hair bands, barrettes (hair-slides), hair pins, hair curling pins, hair nets, plaited hair, tresses of hair, toupeesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035Modelling for advertising or sales promotion, presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
044Beauty salons; hairdressing salonsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 4, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 15, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 15, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 6, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 16, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 12, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 10, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 30, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance