USPTO serial 79102574
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Open-Type Joint Stock Company "ROT FRONT"
Moscow, RU
Other trademarks owned by Open-Type Joint Stock Company "ROT FRONT"
Open-Type Joint Stock Company "ROT FRONT"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Open-Type Joint Stock Company "ROT FRONT"
Open-Type Joint Stock Company "ROT FRONT"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Open-Type Joint Stock Company "ROT FRONT"
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maxim A. Voltchenko
Maxim A. Voltchenko Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP197 State Route 18, Ste 3000, South WingEast Brunswick, NJ 08816UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | [ Peanut confectionery, namely, peanut brittle; almond confectionery, namely, almond cake, sugar coated almonds; ] waffles; confectionery made of sugar [ and confectionery for decorating Christmas trees; farinaceous foods, namely, food pastes for human consumption; stick liquorice; confectionery, namely, pastilles; fondants; liquorice sweets, caramel; cocoa; cocoa beverages with milk; cocoa products, namely, cocoa mixes, cocoa powders, cocoa spreads; cocoa-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; chocolate beverages with milk; pralines; chewing gum, not for medical purposes; tarts; edible decorations for cakes; chocolate, halvah ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 8, 2024 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2024 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |