USPTO serial 79102585
BOZTEPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOZTEPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household and kitchen containers; (non-electric) household and kitchen utensils, namely, utensils by common commercial name graters, spatulas) utensils made of porcelain and stainless steel or porcelain enamel, namely, (by common commercial name, graters, spatulas, turners); glass, namely, (exact nature of goods, drinking glass, glass dishes). Unworked or semiworked, glass not for building; preparation equipments, namely, equipments and utensils for household and kitchen use and purposes; standard gastronorm containers and perforated gastronorm containers for non-electric household and kitchen use (mixing bowls, sauce bowls); dishes, containers, mixing machines, non-electirc, for all purposes, household purposes, portable household containers; mixing machines, namely, non-electric food mixers for household purposes; Service equipments, namely, chafing dishes, non-electric, (used to keep foods hot), ice buckets in the nature of champagne buckets), ice buckets, kitchen utensils in the nature of cake molds, cupcake molds, pastry molds; drinking glasses in the nature of tumblers; portable household containers for food; ice cube molds; pitchers; cups; trays, namely, meal trays, serving trays; self-service trays in the nature of mess-tins; strainers for use of nature for household purposes; tea, wine; bowls; flasks; containers for household and kitchen use kitchen ladles; basting spoon for kitchen use; tableware in the nature of scoops; lunch boxes, bread bins, bread baskets for domestic use, vacuum bottles; cooking equipments, namely, eggcups of metal; stewpans; saucepans; casseroles; pans; frying pans; cake molds; non-electric pressure cookers; tea caddies; non-electric teapots; samovars; tea infusers; tea strainers; urns; tea services; non-electric coffeepots; steam pots; milk pots; creamer pitchers; used to keep milk hot; carrying equipments for kitchen use, namely, grills,batter dispensers; non-electric cooking pots; cooking pot sets, of stainless steel; household containers for foods; refuse bins | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |