USPTO serial 79102613
ECARTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4223731Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2012
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECARTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
61191 Rosbach vor der Höhe, DE
61191 Rosbach vor der Höhe, DE
61191 Rosbach vor der Höhe, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane B. Melnick
Diane B. Melnick Powley & Gibson P.C.304 Hudson St.2nd FloorNew York, NY 10013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services; business management services; business administration; providing office functions; publication of publicity texts; arranging and conducting of trade fairs and exhibitions for commercial and advertising purposes; business planning services for enterprises, promotional event planning services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education, namely, providing classes, workshops, and seminars in the fields of electromobility, electric vehicles, energy storage technologies, engineering and subcontracting in the field of electric vehicles, repair and spare parts associated with electric vehicles, finance of electric vehicles; providing of training in the fields of electromobility, electric vehicles, energy storage technologies, engineering and subcontracting in the field of electric vehicles, repair and spare parts associated with electric vehicles, finance of electric vehicles; providing of training, including through international computer networks in the fields of electromobility, electric vehicles, energy storage technologies, engineering and subcontracting in the field of electric vehicles, repair and spare parts associated with electric vehicles, finance of electric vehicles; online publishing of electronic books and periodicals; design of publications supported by computers, namely, desktop publishing; publication and editing of books, newspapers and periodicals; publication and editing of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic media; production and distribution of film, radio and television programs recorded on video cassettes and video tape films, CDs and magnetic data carriers; arranging and conducting exhibitions, congresses and seminars for cultural, and educational purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sieghard Schnabel
- Other trademarks owned by Sieghard Schnabel
- Other trademarks owned by Sieghard Schnabel
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ECARTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 16, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |