Drawing for DORNIER SEAPLANE

USPTO serial 79102656

DORNIER SEAPLANE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DORNIER SEAPLANE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph R. Dreitler

Joseph R. Dreitler Dreitler True, LLC137 E. State St.Columbus, OH 43215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles, namely, seaplanes; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, structural parts for seaplanes; parts for all the aforesaid goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Online retail store and retail store services featuring vehicles, apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, replacement parts for the aforesaid goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Repair and maintenance of vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air or waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 4, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 21, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 21, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 18, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 9, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance