USPTO serial 79102729
MY DAILY CLICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4262914Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2012
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MY DAILY CLICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Online journals, namely, blogs featuring lifestyle, culture and travel; entertainment services, namely, blogs featuring fashion, travel, design, lifestyle and culture; providing on-line non-downloadable publications in the nature of blogs, in the field of lifestyle, culture and travel; providing non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of blogs in the field of fashion, travel, design, lifestyle and culture; information relating to entertainment, the field of education or cultural activities provided on-line from a computer database or the Internet; organization of events, exhibitions for cultural and entertainment purposes; production of sound and video recordings; production of educational and instructional materials in the nature of blogs; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations feature travel, lifestyle and culture; display of artistic works in the nature of art exhibitions; information, advice and consultancy in respect of French culture, namely, in the field of culture, lifestyle and travel; * none of the foregoing relating to leadership, management, teamwork, personnel development, personnel motivation training, careers and career development or health and healthcare including the causes, treatment and prevention of epilepsy * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |