Drawing for DIT

USPTO serial 79102807

DIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

Mark Lebow Ladas & Parry1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles and structural parts and structural fittings therefor; engines for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 8, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Feb 3, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 22, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 6, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 19, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 19, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 6, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 19, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 12, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 30, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 30, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 30, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 6, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance