Drawing for BETTER TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79102821

BETTER TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4215975Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2012
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTER TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele S. Katz

Michele S. Katz Advitam IP, LLC150 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2400Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Plant-protection products, namely, pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, zoocides, namely, insecticides, ovicides, aphidicides, arvicides, molluscicides, nematocides, rodenticides, talpicidesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 23, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 21, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 27, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 27, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 3, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 3, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 2, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 8, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 16, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 2, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 2, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 4, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 4, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 26, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 26, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 16, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 16, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 19, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 28, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 28, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 28, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 6, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance