USPTO serial 79102830
CABFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4239721Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2012
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CABFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring apparatus and instruments, in particular apparatus and instruments for measuring movements, vibrations and/or imbalance of rotors like shafts and turbine rotors; electric sensors; data processing apparatus and computers; computer peripheral devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |