Drawing for LAWBRARY

USPTO serial 79102859

LAWBRARY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAWBRARY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Fredrickson

JOHN P FREDRICKSON BOYLE FREDRICKSON SC840 N PLANKINTON AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing educational resources in the field of law, namely, on-line searchable library services for accessing statutes, English translations of statutes, court decisions, publications by legal professionals and academics relating thereto, and profiles of contributing authors; educational services, namely, publication of online educational newsletters relating to various legal topics; providing educational information, namely, providing information regarding the availability of seminars, conferences and workshops regarding various legal topics; all of the aforementioned excluding sports-related topicsABANDONED
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design services in the field of computer networking hardware and computer datacenter architecture as it relates to the field of law; industrial analysis and research services in the field of computer networks and architecture as it relates to the field of law; design and development of computer hardware and software; all of the aforementioned excluding sports-related topicsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 27, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 10, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 10, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 12, 2014MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 10, 2014ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 10, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 10, 2014OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Aug 16, 2014RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 1, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 23, 2014OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Jul 23, 2014OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Jun 6, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 24, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 25, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 19, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 19, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 19, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 19, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 16, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 16, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 16, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 15, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 15, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 9, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 6, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 9, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 9, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 9, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 14, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 13, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 13, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 13, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 7, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance