Drawing for ETRO

USPTO serial 79103180

ETRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4252010Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2012
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ETRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randolph E. Digges, III

Randolph E. Digges, III Rankin, Hill & Clark LLPP.O. Box 1150Bonita Springs, FL 34133-1150United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; goods, not included in other classes, of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics, namely, decorative centerpieces, umbrella stands, pillows and decorative pillows, wood boxesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2025EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2024LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Dec 12, 2024LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Nov 15, 2024RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED
May 26, 2024RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 31, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Jan 31, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2023LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Dec 2, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2022RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 20, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 4, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 17, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 17, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 27, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 4, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 4, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 13, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 11, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 31, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 31, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 10, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 8, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 22, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 21, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 14, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 14, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance