USPTO serial 79103268
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
00100 NAIROBI, KE
00100 NAIROBI, KE
00100 NAIROBI, KE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and for groups; travel and tour reservation service; arranging tours and providing travel information about journeys, safari and tourist camps, hotels and lodges | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Making reservations and bookings for others for accommodations and meals at camps, hotels and lodges in tourist destinations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 2, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |