USPTO serial 79103325
DONLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DONLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric motors, not for land vehicles; gears for machines; wind-powered electricity generators; shaft couplings for machines; hobbing machines for metalworking; gear boxes other than for land vehicles; gears, other than for land vehicles, namely, gears for machines; reduction gears other than for land vehicles; motor and engines except for land vehicles; wind turbines and its accessories, namely, generators for wind turbines, wind turbine motors, and compact drive systems for wind turbine motors; milling machines; lathes as machine tools; finishing machines for metalworking; machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing, metals or other materials; metalworking machine tools; grinding machines for metalworking; boring machines for metalworking; planing machines for metalworking; computer controlled lathes; wind turbine gearbox other than for land vehicles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |