CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SUPERSEAM

USPTO serial 79104420

SUPERSEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4216021Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2012
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERSEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Sewing machines; sewing machines for stitching and embroidering; sewing machines for stitching and embroidering gloves; sewing machines for stitching and embroidering clothes; sewing machines for stitching and embroidering shoes; sewing machines for stitching and embroidering leather products for automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Automobile seats, horn pads, steering wheels, shift knobs, brake levers, dashboards for holding instrument panels, door trims and other automobile structural parts; leather upholstery for vehicle seats; leather trim for automobiles, in particular for horn pads, steering wheels, shift knobs, brake levers, instrument panels and for use as door trimsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 10, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 28, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 2, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 26, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 25, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance