Drawing for WINOA

USPTO serial 79104780

WINOA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4163020Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2012
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with WINOA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Holly M. Ford Lewis

Holly M. Ford Lewis OLIFF PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA, 22320-4850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Abrasive metal and mineral particles in the form of balls, marbles, grains, and shots used for cleaning, deburring, delustering, polishing and scouring the aspect of metal surfacesACTIVE—
007[ Machines for projecting and recycling abrasive particles used for cleaning, deburring, delustering and altering the aspect of metal surfaces ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Providing information on treatment materials, particularly, in the field of using and recycling abrasive particles used for cleaning, deburring, delustering and altering the aspect of metal surfaces; material treatment services relating to the treatment of materials in connection with the use and recycling of abrasive particles used for cleaning, deburring, delustering and altering the aspect of metal surfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2023INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 27, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 24, 2023EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2022PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Nov 29, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 26, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 19, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 201871.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 18, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 20, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 6, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 29, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 22, 2015RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 26, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 8, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 6, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance