Drawing for MOBA

USPTO serial 79104971

MOBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4252051Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2012
Examiner
BUJA, SANDRA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Weltsch

KEITH A. WELTSCH SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER, P.C.400 GARDEN CITY PLZ STE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3319UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Moses baskets, namely, bassinets of plastic, rubber, synthetic rubber, wicker or synthetic wicker, baby cribs, cots, baby travel carriers, namely, carry cotsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2025Further Decision Processed by IB—
Apr 12, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 18, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 16, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 4, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 19, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 12, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 31, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 15, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance