Drawing for TALEN

USPTO serial 79107519

TALEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4729507Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 5, 2015
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TALEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Blue Filament Law PLLC700 E. Maple RoadSuite 450Birmingham, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical, biochemical, biotechnological and bacteriological products for use in industry, agriculture, horticulture, namely, polypeptides and nucleic acid vectors for in vivo and in vitro genetic engineering, natural and engineered endoncucleases, all the aforementioned products being intended exclusively for the purpose of modifying the genome of any kind of cell, all of the aforementioned products explicitly excluding resinsACTIVE
005Veterinary and hygienic products, namely, nucleic acid sequences, stem cells, chemical and biological reagents, bacteria, yeasts, enzymes, bacteriological preparations, natural and engineered endoncucleases, and polypeptides and nucleic acid vectors for in vivo and in vitro genetic engineering, for medical purposes; gene therapy products, namely, genetically engineered tissues for transplant purposes; nutritional additives in the nature of dietary and nutritional supplements for medical purposes; micro-organism preparations and cultures for medical, pharmaceutical and/or veterinary purposes; all the aforementioned products being intended exclusively for the purpose of modifying the genome of any kind of cellACTIVE
042Technical, project studies; cell engineering consulting services; [ computer programming, software and multimedia product design and development, ] all the aforementionned services being intended exclusively for the purpose of modifying the genome of any kind of cellACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 30, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 30, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 29, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 6, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 5, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 5, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
May 5, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 5, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 5, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 5, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 2, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 28, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 5, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 5, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 15, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 2, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 31, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 31, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 5, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 5, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 27, 2015TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Mar 27, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 27, 2015OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Mar 27, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 30, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 28, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 22, 2013OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Aug 22, 2013OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Aug 14, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 26, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 11, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 6, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 3, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 8, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Dec 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 4, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 27, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 26, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 17, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 12, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance