USPTO serial 79107927
EPRINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPRINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software development; design of computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer programming; consultancy of computer security; rental of computers, computer software and web servers; web sites hosting services; electronic hosting of data, computer files, computer applications and information for others; provision of cloud computing services; providing personal technological information over computer networks, wireless networks and global communications networks; providing on-line non-downloadable operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; providing on-line non-downloadable software for software development and website development; providing on-line non-downloadable software for operating and maintaining computer networks and servers; providing on-line non-downloadable software for database management; providing a full line of on-line non-downloadable business and application software; providing information of the development and operation of computer software and computer networks; customization of computer hardware and software; computer hardware and software consulting services; consulting in the field of information technology; consulting in the field of cloud computing networks and applications; design and development of networks and network software and applications; graphic design for the compilation of web pages on the internet; creating and maintaining web-sites; creating and maintaining software for managing digital copyrights | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |