USPTO serial 79108072
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GRABOPLAST Padlógyártó zártkörúen muködo Részvénytársaság
Gyor, HU
Other trademarks owned by GRABOPLAST Padlógyártó zártkörúen muködo Részvénytársaság
GRABOPLAST Padlógyártó; zártkörúen muködo; Részvénytársaság
Gyor, HU
Other trademarks owned by GRABOPLAST Padlógyártó; zártkörúen muködo; Részvénytársaság
GRABOPLAST Padlógyártó; zártkörúen muködo; Részvénytársaság
Gyor, HU
Other trademarks owned by GRABOPLAST Padlógyártó; zártkörúen muködo; Részvénytársaság
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin P. Hoffman
Martin P. Hoffman STEIN IP LLC1990 M Street, N.W.Suite 610WASHINGTON, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Anti-bacterial linoleums and other floor covering materials for covering existing floors, namely, carpets, rugs, and mats; floor plates from polyvinyl, namely, linoleum tiles: all of the foregong containing silver | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 25, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |