USPTO serial 79109205
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Atlanta, Georgia, US
Atlanta, Georgia, US
Atlanta, Georgia, US
CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca A. Liebowitz
Rebecca A. Liebowitz Venable LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications apparatus, instruments and devices that deliver telecommunications services, broadband communications services, telecommunications connections to the Internet, telecommunications connections to mobile telecommunications networks, and telecommunications connections to fixed line telecommunications networks, namely, telephones, mobile phones, headsets for telephones, devices for hands free use of mobile phones, Mobile base stations, mobile switching center servers, call agents, media gateways, session border controllers, media transcoders, media resource functions, application servers; apparatus, instruments and devices for providing user access services to the Internet by delivering telecommunications services, broadband communications services, telecommunications connections to the Internet, telecommunications connections to mobile telecommunications networks, telecommunications connections to fixed line telecommunications networks, namely, telephones, mobile phones, headsets for telephones, devices for hands free use of mobile phones, Mobile base stations, mobile switching center servers, call agents, media gateways, session border controllers, media transcoders, media resource functions, application servers; computers; computer hardware; computer software for provision of mobile telecommunication services; computer chips; telephones; mobile telephones; cameras | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice and audio by means of wireless communication networks; wireless broadband communication services; providing telecommunications connections to the Internet; providing telecommunications connections to mobile telecommunications networks; providing telecommunications connections to fixed line telecommunications networks; Internet portal services, namely, providing access to Internet portals; providing user access services to the Internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 24, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |