Drawing for HD VOICE

USPTO serial 79109205

HD VOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4427002Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 5, 2013
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HD VOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca A. Liebowitz

Rebecca A. Liebowitz Venable LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications apparatus, instruments and devices that deliver telecommunications services, broadband communications services, telecommunications connections to the Internet, telecommunications connections to mobile telecommunications networks, and telecommunications connections to fixed line telecommunications networks, namely, telephones, mobile phones, headsets for telephones, devices for hands free use of mobile phones, Mobile base stations, mobile switching center servers, call agents, media gateways, session border controllers, media transcoders, media resource functions, application servers; apparatus, instruments and devices for providing user access services to the Internet by delivering telecommunications services, broadband communications services, telecommunications connections to the Internet, telecommunications connections to mobile telecommunications networks, telecommunications connections to fixed line telecommunications networks, namely, telephones, mobile phones, headsets for telephones, devices for hands free use of mobile phones, Mobile base stations, mobile switching center servers, call agents, media gateways, session border controllers, media transcoders, media resource functions, application servers; computers; computer hardware; computer software for provision of mobile telecommunication services; computer chips; telephones; mobile telephones; camerasSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
038Telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice and audio by means of wireless communication networks; wireless broadband communication services; providing telecommunications connections to the Internet; providing telecommunications connections to mobile telecommunications networks; providing telecommunications connections to fixed line telecommunications networks; Internet portal services, namely, providing access to Internet portals; providing user access services to the InternetSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 21, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 22, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 22, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
May 15, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 10, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 10, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 5, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 24, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 20, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 31, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 17, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 17, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 9, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 9, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 9, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 8, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 25, 2013PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST
Jun 20, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 20, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 22, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 22, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 22, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 22, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 3, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 9, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 30, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 12, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 12, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 2, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 1, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance