Drawing for SMARTCOMBO

USPTO serial 79110711

SMARTCOMBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4228478Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2012
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTCOMBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lim

Karen Lim Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd St., 17th Fl.New York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industry for perfecting and maintaining vacuum; polymers treated for perfecting and maintaining vacuumSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
017non-woven polymeric materials, namely, films, extruded sheets, or pallets treated for perfecting and maintaining vacuumSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 23, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 26, 2019CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Oct 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 23, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 23, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 23, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 13, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 12, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 23, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 23, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 10, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 10, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 12, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 11, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance