USPTO serial 79112750
CANTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4449410Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2013
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CANTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.a.
IT
Other trademarks owned by Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.a.
Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.A.
Milano, IT
Other trademarks owned by Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.A.
Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.a.
IT
Other trademarks owned by Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.a.
Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.A.
IT
Other trademarks owned by Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane M. Byers
Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.a.
- Other trademarks owned by Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.a.
- Other trademarks owned by Fratelli Martini Secondo Luigi S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CANTI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 21, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 21, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |