USPTO serial 79112939
AQUIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4398206Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 2013
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AQUIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Reidl
Paul W. Reidl Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | [ Precious metals and their alloys; goods in precious metal or coated therewith, namely, jewelry; precious stones; ] horological and chronometric instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 10, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |