USPTO serial 79113878
LINDOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINDOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
Stacey R. Halpern Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, Fourteenth FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mix and mixing machines; industrial mixers and mixing machines; electric mixers and mixer grinders for use in mixing of and for foodstuffs, liquids, adhesives, metals, plastics, pharmaceutical products, cement, varnishing, paints, resins, chemicals, goods of plastic and semi-plastic, and coatings; electromechanical mixers; electromechanical chopping machines; industrial electric vibrators; mixing machines and grinding mills for the chemical, ceramic, metallurgical, construction materials, plastic processing, food processing, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, petrochemical and paint industries; actuators, regulators, accessories in the nature of drums, scoops, blades, liquid injectors and valve plates being parts of mix and mixing machines; machines not included in other classes, namely drying machines, heating machines, cooling machines, impregnators and coaters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |