Drawing for BELTAN

USPTO serial 79114526

BELTAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4329976Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 7, 2013
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BELTAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Heinisch

Andrew J. Heinisch Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren P.C.2215 Perrygreen WayRockford, IL 61107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Packing and insulating materials; watertightness seal for civil engineering applications; sealant compounds for joints; sealant compounds for interlocks of sheet pilesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
019Asphalt, pitch and bitumen; bituminous products, especially bituminous products used in the manufacture of watertight claw couplings for sheet piles, namely, bitumen and bitumen-based sealantsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 2, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 5, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 16, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 13, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 7, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 7, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 7, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 7, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 30, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 8, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 7, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 7, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 7, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 3, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 28, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 28, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 27, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 23, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 20, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 19, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance