Drawing for MVM

USPTO serial 79118063

MVM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4479301Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 11, 2014
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MVM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristine L. Butler

Kristine L. Butler Volpe and Koenig, PC30 S. 17th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103-4009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools used for grinding, sharpening and lapping; flat grinding machines for blades, power tool blades, knives, electric knives, saws, power saw blades, circular saws, band saws, and belt saws; wood-working lathes; blade sharpening machines and blade sharpening machine tools for industrial use; sharpening machines for belt saws, disc saws and blade saws; and parts and spare parts therefor included in this classSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 8, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 11, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 11, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 2, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 3, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 5, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance