Drawing for BEA

USPTO serial 79118568

BEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4381720Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 13, 2013
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Schiffmiller

Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.66 Palmer Avenue, Suite 49BBronxville, NY 10708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Radar, laser, infrared or inductive ring sensors that measure movements of objects or persons, presence of objects or persons or distance of objects or persons, for automation and security applicationsACTIVE
037Installation, maintenance and repair of sensors dedicated to automation and security applications, namely, sensors for opening automatic doorsACTIVE
042Scientific research, namely, development of applications for openers and safety sensors for automatic doors, for protection of objects and people, for counting sensors, and for alarm and protection systems; engineering services, namely, development of applications for openers and safety sensors for automatic doors, for protection of objects and people, for counting sensors, and for alarm and protection systems; computer software development, namely, development of applications for openers and safety sensors for automatic doors, for protection of objects and people, for counting sensors, and for alarm and protection systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 11, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 8, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 27, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 16, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 16, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 15, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
May 2, 2019PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Apr 30, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 12, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 22, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 13, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 13, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 28, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 20, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 1, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 11, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 30, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 26, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 26, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 26, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 23, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 22, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance