USPTO serial 79119122
IVALUA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IVALUA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus; computer peripherical equipment; computer software; software; recorded computer programs; computer peripheral devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; business administration consultancy; providing office functions; direct mail advertising services; arranging newspaper subscriptions for others; business management and consultation; accounting services; rental of advertising space on web sites; dissemination of advertisements; public relations; business management; document reproduction; employment agencies; computerized file management; publication of publicity texts; rental of advertising space; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; on-line advertising on a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications consultation; information about telecommunication; communication via computer terminals or via fiber-optic networks; communications by radio and telephone; providing user access to a global computer network; news agency services for electronic transmission; rental of telecommunication equipment; Television and radio broadcasting services; teleconferencing services; electronic messaging services; rental of access time to global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design and development of computers and software; research and development of new products for others; design of interior decor; computer programming; consultancy in the field of computers; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; industrial design services; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; vehicle roadworthiness testing; graphic arts designing services; styling consisting in industrial design services; authenticating works of art | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2013 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |