Drawing for JULES

USPTO serial 79123103

JULES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4557834Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 1, 2014
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with JULES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison Strickland Ricketts

Allison Strickland Ricketts Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003perfumery, beauty products, namely, perfumes, eau de toilette, eau de cologne [, deodorants for personal use, after-shave lotion, shaving balms, shower and bath gels, soaps, lotions and creams for body care ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2026INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Sep 17, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 17, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 17, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 13, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 25, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 17, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 3, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 2, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 25, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 25, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Nov 25, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Nov 17, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 23, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 24, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 1, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 19, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 4, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 4, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 15, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 26, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 26, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 26, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 17, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 17, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 17, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 14, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 11, 2013LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Jun 11, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 8, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 6, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 29, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 29, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 26, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 26, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 19, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2013RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 4, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 2, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 15, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 3, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance