USPTO serial 79125356
DEEPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4975210Status 707Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2016
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DEEPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LT-10224 Vilnius, LT
LT-10224 Vilnius, LT
Vilnius, LT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin Ter., Suite 1LAKEWOOD RANCH, FL 34202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Distance measuring apparatus; distance recording apparatus, namely, laser distance meters, sonars; [ data processing apparatus; ] sounding apparatus and machines, namely, sound recording apparatus, sound reproducing apparatus, sound reproduction apparatus, sound transmitting apparatus; [ water level indicators; ] marine depth finders; measuring devices, namely, electric ammeters, ohmmeters and multimeters for the measurement of temperature, depth and bottom terrain; transmitters of electronic signals; telemeters; range finders; photographic viewfinders, ultrasound measuring instrumentation and apparatus, namely, plummets and echo-sounders for the measurement of depth of water supplies and detection of under-water objects | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | [ Bite indicators, bite sensors; scent lures for hunting or fishing; artificial fishing bait; lures for hunting or fishing; rods for fishing; landing nets for anglers; floats for fishing; fishing tackle; reels for fishing; lines for fishing; fish hooks; fishing tackle ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Mar 10, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 12, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2015 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |