USPTO serial 79128924
EPD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4531272Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2014
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-9477 Trübbach, CH
CH-9477 Trübbach, CH
CH-9477 Trübbach, CH
Oerlikon Surface Solutions AG, Pfäffikon
Pfäffikon, CH
Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Surface Solutions AG, Pfäffikon
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Garvey
Michael W. Garvey Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | [ Coating lacquers and metallized coating lacquers for giving a metallic appearance to plastic surfaces; protective coatings for plastic surfaces and metallized surfaces of plastic components, in the form of spray-coated lacquers combined with vapor-deposited coatings ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Spraying installations for coating parts with lacquer combined with apparatus for material deposition under vacuum | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Applying surface coatings to parts, particularly plastic parts, namely, inorganic coatings such as hard coatings, metal coatings, metal-ceramic coatings and diamond coatings combined with organic coatings such as lacquers, in particular transparent lacquers; applying surface coatings in the form of the combination of lacquer spraying and vapor deposition of coatings, in particular by cathode sputtering layers incorporated between spray-deposited lacquer layers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Trading AG, Trübbach
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Trading AG, Trübbach
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Trading AG, Trübbach
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Surface Solutions AG, Pfäffikon
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named EPD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 20, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 14, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |