USPTO serial 79129548
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON ST STE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205-4917UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith not included in other classes; jewelry, precious stones; timepieces and chronometric instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins; trunks and suitcases; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 27, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |