Drawing for LEOCA

USPTO serial 79134398

LEOCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEOCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JewelrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing; footwear; headgear; shirts; belts (clothing); furs (clothing); gloves (clothing); scarves; hosiery; socks; slippers; underwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 21, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 7, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 20, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 20, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 21, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 21, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 20, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 10, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 10, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 10, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 24, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 15, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance