USPTO serial 79141094
SUPEREVAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4673447Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2015
- Examiner
- RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPEREVAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen C. Kline
Karen C. Kline DUANE MORRIS LLP1875 NW Corporate Blvd, Suite 300BR-IPDBOCA RATON, FL 33431-8561Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Machines, namely, apparatus for urea, ammonia and methanol synthesis in the nature of blending machines for chemical processing, disintegrators, disposable industrial mixer for mixing liquids, dissolving machines, dust collecting machines for chemical processing, emulsifying machines, extracting machines, filtering machines for chemical processing, grinding mills, industrial mixer for mixing liquids, kneading machines, and presses for chemical processing; Machines, namely, mechanical spreaders for seed and dry lawn chemicals, granulating machines, and industrial chemical reactors ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Laboratory chemical reactors; reactors, coils, retorts and crackers for use in high temperature chemical reactions ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design of chemical plants and installations; [ design of monitoring systems for chemical plants and installations; development of software for control of chemical processes; ] technical assistance and consulting concerning chemical processes and chemical factories and installations; drafting of plans for the construction of chemical plants and installations [ ; engineers' consulting for commissioning of chemical factories and installations ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CASALE SA
- Other trademarks owned by CASALE SA
- Other trademarks owned by CASALE SA
- Other trademarks owned by Urea Casale SA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SUPEREVAMP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 20, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |