Drawing for AR

USPTO serial 79143686

AR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SARA M. DORCHAK

SARA M. DORCHAK COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Valve seats for internal combustion enginesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 13, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 16, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 29, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 29, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 30, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 14, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW
Sep 4, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 19, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 3, 2015GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
May 3, 2015GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
May 3, 2015CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Apr 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 7, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 8, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 3, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 3, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 13, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance