USPTO serial 79143915
AQUAPICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUAPICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seoul153-780, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Maier
Timothy J. Maier Maier & Maier PLLC345 South Patrick St.Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Floss for dental purposes; manual toothbrushes; non-electric toothbrushes; toothbrush cases; toothbrushes; water apparatus for cleaning teeth and gums for home use; electric toothbrushes; toothpicks; cups; cosmetic utensils, namely, brushes, spatulas, droppers; aerosol dispensers, not for medical purposes; buckets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2015 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |