Drawing for E-CUBE

USPTO serial 79143962

E-CUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4910633Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2016
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with E-CUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Christopher Schroeder

James Christopher Schroeder Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC420 Lake Cook Rd., STE 117Deerfield, IL 60015United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Filters for machines removing contaminants from waste water and gases used in the automobile industry; gas filters as parts of industrial machines; cartridges for filtering machines removing contaminants from waste water and gases used in the automobile industry; casings for filter cartridges for industrial machines made out of plastic or metal or cardboard; parts of machines, namely dust of aerosol separators made of metal, plastic synthetics, cloth textiles, non woven materials, fibers, cardboard and/or paper for filtering gases; removable filter cartridges for filtering gases made of rubber, plastic synthetics, cloth textiles, non woven materials, fibers, cardboard and/or paper; filter as part of industrial installations, namely, gas filters for coating machines; gas filters for dust or aerosol collecting as parts of industrial installations, namely, gas filters for coating machinesACTIVE
011Filter machines for waste water treatment, namely, water filtration units for removing contaminants from waste water; filter as part of industrial installations, namely, gas filters; air filtration systems, namely, air filtration installations for filtering overspray from air; water filter systems, namely, water filtration units; filter devices, namely, filters made of metal, plastic synthetics, cloth textiles, non woven materials, fibers, cardboard or paper for gas conditioning and water filtration units;water filtration systems, namely, water filtration apparatus that uses water to treat waste air in paint shops and spray boothsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 6, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 28, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 6, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 3, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Aug 3, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Aug 2, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 17, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 1, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 8, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 15, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 7, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 22, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 22, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 8, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 22, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 2, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 26, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 26, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 30, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 20, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance