USPTO serial 79144055
HUMAN-IDENTICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUMAN-IDENTICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy Spagnole-DeRosa
Amy Spagnole-DeRosa McDonald Hopkins LLC600 Superior Avenu East, Suite 2100Cleveland, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical and biological derivatives of human milk oligosaccharide compounds and chemical and biological precursors of human milk oligosaccharide compounds for use in the manufacturing of food; chemical and biological derivatives of human milk oligosaccharide compounds and chemical and biological precursors of human milk oligosaccharide compounds for scientific use other than for medical or veterinary use; chemical and biological derivatives of human milk oligosaccharide compounds and chemical and biological precursors of human milk oligosaccharide compounds for industrial use; chemical and biological derivatives of human milk oligosaccharide compounds and chemical and biological precursors of human milk oligosaccharide compounds for use in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, infant formula, foodstuffs and animal foods; chemicals in the form of human milk oligosaccharide compounds and chemical and biological precursors of human milk oligosaccharide compounds for use as a supplement in the manufacture of dietary supplements and infant formula | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Food for babies, including infant formula, all containing human milk oligosaccharide; dietary supplements containing human milk oligosaccharides for humans and animals; medicated food additives in the nature of dietary supplements containing human milk oligosaccharides for humans and for animals; preparations containing human milk oligosaccharides for use as additives for food for human or animal consumption namely nutritional supplements and vitamin preparations for use as dietary supplements and infant formula; food supplements containing human milk oligosaccharide for dietetic use; dietary supplements containing human milk oligosaccharide for medical use; medicated supplements containing human milk oligosaccharide for foodstuffs for humans, including for infants, and for animals; mineral food supplements containing human milk oligosaccharide; colostrum supplements containing human milk oligosaccharide; dietary supplemental containing human milk oligosaccharide in the form of beverages; dietary supplements containing human milk oligosaccharide for infants | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |