Drawing for COREDNA

USPTO serial 79144101

COREDNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4680336Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 3, 2015
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with COREDNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly T. Eichten

Molly T. Eichten Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.8300 Norman Center DriveSuite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55437

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software development and maintenance; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for managing the database which allows the user to create, design and service web pages for others, namely, creating virtual communities for registered users to interact and participate in discussions; creating and maintaining web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; providing temporary use of a web-based application for managing a database; providing an Internet website portal in the fields of software development; web site design; computer database consultancy services; creating and maintaining web sites for others; creating and maintaining weblogs (blogs) for others; design of information technology systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 22, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 19, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 8, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 18, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 2, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 2, 2020C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 1, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 4, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 5, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 4, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 3, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 29, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 10, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 7, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 30, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 21, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 20, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance