Drawing for KIDI-CHOC

USPTO serial 79144213

KIDI-CHOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIDI-CHOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flours and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice for refreshmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2020UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Mar 7, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 6, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 31, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 4, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 4, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 11, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 26, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 26, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 4, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 23, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 7, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 7, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 6, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 25, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 21, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 20, 2014SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance