Drawing for FULLER-TRAYLOR

USPTO serial 79144673

FULLER-TRAYLOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4815183Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 22, 2015
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with FULLER-TRAYLOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, crushing machines, namely, impact crushers for crushing rocks and minerals from large size material to small size material; rock, ore, sand and gravel handling machines for industrial and commercial applications, namely, gyratory crushers, jaw crushers and roll crushers; grinding machines for grinding rock, ore and dry solid materials used in cement production; mills for reducing particle size of dry solid materials used in cement production, rock and ore, namely, ball mills, pebble mills, tube mills, rod mills, rolling mills, grinding mills, semi-autogenous mills and beater mills; washing machines for washing rock, ore and dry solid materials used in cement production; machines for processing iron ore into pellets, namely, pelletizers; casting wheels as part of casting machines; metal production machines, namely, converters for purifying molten metal; parts and accessories for all afore-mentioned goodsACTIVE—
011Apparatus and equipment for heating, namely, anode furnaces, holding furnaces, rotary kilns and drying kilns, drying apparatus for use in removing moisture from minerals during processing; parts and accessories for all afore-mentioned goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 9, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 8, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 8, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 22, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 9, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 12, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 15, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance