Drawing for COLLI RIPANI

USPTO serial 79144753

COLLI RIPANI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4710004Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 31, 2015
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with COLLI RIPANI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine [ ; sparkling wines; distilled spirits; liqueurs; sparkling alcoholic beverages, namely, sparkling fruit wines; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; alcoholic beverages, except beer ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 11, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 11, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 30, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 26, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 25, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 24, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 22, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 2, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 11, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 30, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 13, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 24, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 24, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 6, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 6, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 20, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Nov 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 20, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 20, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2014RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 11, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 8, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 8, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 8, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 4, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 3, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance