USPTO serial 79144859
EXAKT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5613975Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2018
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EXAKT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EXAKT Advanced Technologies GmbH
22851 Norderstredt, DE
EXAKT Advanced Technologies GmbH
22851 Norderstredt, DE
EXAKT Advanced Technologies GmbH
22851 Norderstredt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J Shire
Howard J Shire Troutman Pepper Locke LLP875 3rd AvenueNew York, NY 10022United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Three roll mills and parts and fittings in the nature of hopper, scraper socket, scraper knifes, plastic guides, safety bridge and nipcover for material development and production for food processing industry, printing industry, electronic parts industry, cosmetics industry, chemical industry, photovoltaics industry, battery industry, capacitor industry, dental industry and pharmaceutical industry; Cutting and grinding machines featuring thin section cutting technology for targeted dividing and treatment of highly sensitive materials for material research and development, quality assurance, production, histologic and implantation research and parts and fittings therefor in the nature of hopper, scraper socket, scraper knifes, plastic guides, safety bridge and nipcover; ointment mills for the mixing and production of pharmaceutical ointments and parts and fittings therefor in the nature of hopper, scraper socket, scraper knifes, plastic guides, safety bridge and nipcover; pathology saws; Consumables and wearing parts for three roll mills for material development and production for food processing industry, printing industry, electronic parts industry, cosmetics industry, chemical industry, photovoltaics industry, battery industry, capacitor industry, dental industry and pharmaceutical industry, namely, scraper knifes and plastic guides; consumables and wearing parts for cutting and grinding machines featuring thin section cutting technology for targeted dividing and treatment of highly sensitive materials for material research and development, quality assurance, production, histologic and implantation research, namely, scraper knifes and plastic guides; consumables and wearing parts for ointment mills for the mixing and production of pharmaceutical ointments, namely, scraper knifes and plastic guides | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for scientific research in laboratories and consumables therefor, namely, diamond band saw and diamond bands, micro grinding system comprising grinders for histology, anatomy and pathology and consumable parts therefor in the nature of scraper knifes and plastic guides, grinding paper, three roll mills and plastic guides as well as scraper knifes | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | The construction, repair, installation and servicing of three roll mills a for material development and production for food processing industry, printing industry, electronic parts industry, cosmetics industry, chemical industry, photovoltaics industry, battery industry, capacitor industry, dental industry and pharmaceutical industry; the construction, repair, installation and servicing of cutting and grinding machines for material research and development, quality assurance, production, histologic and implantation research; the construction, repair, installation and servicing of ointment mills for the mixing and production of pharmaceutical ointments; the construction, repair, installation and servicing of diamond band saws and grinders for histology, anatomy and pathology; the construction, repair, installation and servicing of apparatus and instruments for scientific research in laboratories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXAKT Advanced Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by EXAKT Advanced Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by EXAKT Advanced Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named EXAKT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |