USPTO serial 79144912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
Yaesu Musen Kabushiki Kaisha (also trad ing as Yaesu Musen Co., Ltd.)
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Yaesu Musen Kabushiki Kaisha (also trad ing as Yaesu Musen Co., Ltd.)
Tokyo, JP
Yaesu Musen Kabushiki Kaisha (also trad ing as Yaesu Musen Co., Ltd.)
JP
Other trademarks owned by Yaesu Musen Kabushiki Kaisha (also trad ing as Yaesu Musen Co., Ltd.)
Yaesu Musen Kabushiki Kaisha (also trad ing as Yaesu Musen Co., Ltd.)
JP
Other trademarks owned by Yaesu Musen Kabushiki Kaisha (also trad ing as Yaesu Musen Co., Ltd.)
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Anne Keefe
Sarah Anne Keefe Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 600BOSTON, MA 02210United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication machines and apparatus namely two way radio and trunking repeater controllers; Parts and accessories used for telecommunications machines and apparatus namely microphone, battery pack and case, antenna for specific use with ham radio operations, charger, adapter, cable, headset, external speakers, and power supplies; Electronic machines and apparatus related to two way radio; Parts and accessories for electronic machines and apparatus namely electronic circuit board, variable frequency oscillators | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |