Drawing for BAUER

USPTO serial 79145292

BAUER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAUER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat extracts for making broths; broths; soups; beef stock; fish stock; chicken stock; veal stock; bouillon concentrates; stock cubes; mixes for making broths; preparations for making bouillonSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Dried condiments for food; lyophilized sauces for food; sauce mixes; seasonings for foods; flavorings for foods, other than essential oils; dry seasoning mixes for food; preserved garden herbs as seasonings; processed garlic for use as seasoningSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 15, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 3, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 27, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 17, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 3, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 28, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 26, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 26, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 18, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 17, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance