USPTO serial 79145292
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat extracts for making broths; broths; soups; beef stock; fish stock; chicken stock; veal stock; bouillon concentrates; stock cubes; mixes for making broths; preparations for making bouillon | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Dried condiments for food; lyophilized sauces for food; sauce mixes; seasonings for foods; flavorings for foods, other than essential oils; dry seasoning mixes for food; preserved garden herbs as seasonings; processed garlic for use as seasoning | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 15, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |