USPTO serial 79145297
FOOTUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4801585Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2015
- Examiner
- MITTLER, KEVIN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOOTUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Vehicles, namely, cars; foot rests for safety seats for children, for vehicles; safety seats for children, for vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |