Drawing for TUSCAN SCENT GOLDEN ACACIA

USPTO serial 79145815

TUSCAN SCENT GOLDEN ACACIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUSCAN SCENT GOLDEN ACACIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea L. Calvaruso, Esq.

Andrea L. Calvaruso, Esq. Kelley, Drye & Warren, LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, eau de parfum, eau de Cologne, toilet water, after shave creams, after shave lotions, shaving lotions, shaving creams and foams, shampoos, hair conditioners, beauty masks, cold creams, hand creams, body and facial creams, deodorants for personal use, antiperspirants for personal use, skin cleansers, soaps for personal use, toilet soaps, bath soaps, bath and shower foams, bath and shower gel, body oils, body lotions, skin lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 3, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 13, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 30, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 6, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 6, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 6, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 29, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 24, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance