USPTO serial 79146328
SP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4750042Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2015
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.PO BOX 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | [ Land vehicles; ] apparatus for locomotion by land, namely, baby strollers, baby carriages, baby carriages transformable into carry cots, children's and infant's [ bicycles and ] tricycles, structural parts for all the foregoing goods; [ motorized and non-motorized scooters; ] safety seats for use in cars; portable baby seats and boosters seats, namely, children's car seats [ ; structural parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods; all included in this class ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All-purpose carrying bags, diaper bags, nappy bags for carrying babies' accessories, stroller bags for carrying babies' accessories, changing bags for carrying babies' accessories, [ suitcases, pouches, namely, pouch baby carriers; all included in this class ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2022 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 14, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |