Drawing for WKU

USPTO serial 79146504

WKU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WKU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Kirton McConkie60 E. South Temple1800 World Trade CenterSalt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Organizing, arranging, and conducting of sports exhibitions, events, demonstrations, performances and competitions exclusively in the field of karate and kickboxing sports; Karate and kickboxing instructionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 13, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 21, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 14, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 14, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 5, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 19, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 19, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 17, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 16, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 8, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance