USPTO serial 79147252
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Cheadle, Cheshire, GB
Luxembourg, LU
Luxembourg, LU
Luxembourg, LU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. Box 230692New York, NY 10023UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, baby multiple activity toys, children's multiple activity toys, baby activity toys, children's activity toys, crib toys, bath toys, educational toys for developing fine motor, oral language, numbers, counting, colours and alphabet skills, pull toys, sand toys, musical toys, and rattles; sporting articles not included in other classes, namely, activity balls | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |